One fundamental part of “intelligence” is being able to come up with independent thoughts. Another is to be able to think critically about those thoughts. LLMs cannot do either.
One fundamental part of “intelligence” is being able to come up with independent thoughts. Another is to be able to think critically about those thoughts. LLMs cannot do either.
Zacryon@feddit.org 1 day ago
Is it though? By which definition?
What is “thinking critically about thoughts”?
And what is an “independent thought”? Aren’t our brains not just reacting to sensory inputs and dictated by the way our brains are wired?
Maybe we should go even further and clarify what a “thought” even is.
Are animals, who lack the higher cognitive functions, that humans have, therefore not “intelligent”? Are mentally impaired people no longer to be considered “intelligent”? If so, where is the line to be drawn? What are the specific definitions and criteria to correctly distinguish intelligence from non- or pseudo-intelligence?
princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
I dunno mate, go read the wikipedia article or something.
Zacryon@feddit.org 1 day ago
Well, in that case I wonder why you were criticising the field of AI. Doesn’t seem to be substantiated.
princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Me not having the spoons to debate a necro comment doesn’t make you right. ✌️