Didn’t speed disk do an optimised defragment operation, putting OS files at the start of the drive etc
xmanmonk@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
Which came first, DriveSpace or Norton Speed Disk? I thought Norton was first.
LucyLastic@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Decipher0771@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Different tools. Speed disk was a disk defragmenter, DriveSpace was whole disk compression. The Norton tool you’d have used a lot if you used DriveSpace was Norton Disk Doctor.
sj_zero 1 year ago
And as I recall, Norton had all the tools long before MS-DOS included them by default. It was sort of a dick move by Microsoft, the sort of thing they're famous for now.
ksaj@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
Raise your hand if you used to sit and watch Norton’s defragger do its thing! 🤩
Decipher0771@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
DOS has always? had chkdsk, but ndd had a knack for being able to recover data from minor corruptions way better than chkdsk did.
Between ndd, Spinrite, and I can’t remember the name of the undelete tools, I saved a lot of homework assignments.
sj_zero 1 year ago
chkdsk in dos never had the ability to scan the disk surface for defects, ndd did that, and then magically scandisk showed up and looked awfully similar to ndd.
But I agree, some really great tools. And sysinfo was our de facto "how fast is this thing?" for years.