oh quit that bs. There was waterproof (not resistant) micro usb more than a literal decade ago. If anything they should have gottn better.
It’s also hard to make a port like that water resistant. Using wireless charging is easier to make flat and seal tightly.
vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 days ago
roofuskit@lemmy.world 2 days ago
And that requires more space than a typical port. In a compact device that is difficult.
paraphrand@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Eww, micro usb. I get the shakes just thinking about it.
Zak@lemmy.world 2 days ago
If you mean a USB-C port in general, they can be made waterproof. If you mean something specific to putting one in the most compact form factor possible, that might be true.
roofuskit@lemmy.world 2 days ago
And that requires more space than a typical port. In a compact device that is difficult.
Zak@lemmy.world 2 days ago
You might be surprised at everything going on inside a modern flashlight. I’ll grant that it’s probably easier to find room for extra seals around the port than in a smartwatch though.
roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Still not nearly as complex or compact as a smart watch. A little microcontroller versus an arm processor.
cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
A switch mode LED driver can be made very tiny with as few as 4 components. Battery protection and a single cell battery charger can also be very simple.
fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 day ago
That kind of waterproofing wears over time (years). It keeps it’s resistance, but not a submersible seal. Watches have longer use years than phones on average.
jonathan@piefed.social 1 day ago
They can be waterproof but are also non functional until the water is fully cleared from the port.