Comment

Comment on Tesla withheld data, lied, and misdirected police and plaintiffs to avoid blame in Autopilot crash

patatahooligan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

Forensic analysis managed to retrieve this data, so it must have been stored in non-volatile memory.

Sort:hotnew top

kjetil@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
Didnt the article say the retrieved the filename and hash, thus proving the existence of the crash diagnostic snapshot. After which Tesla handed over their copy?

Or did the forensics retrieve the actual data?

source
- patatahooligan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
  The article kind of fumbles the wording and creates confusion. There are, however, some passages that indicate to me that the actual data was recovered. All of the following are taking about the NAND flash memory.
  
  The engineers quickly found that all the data was there despite Tesla’s previous claims.
  
  …
  
  Now, the plaintiffs had access to everything.
  
  …
  
  Moore was astonished by all the data found through cloning the Autopilot ECU:
  
  “For an engineer like me, the data out of those computers was a treasure‑trove of how this crash happened.”
  
  …
  
  On top of all the data being so much more helpful, Moore found unallocated space and metadata for snapshot_collision_airbag‑deployment.tar’, including its SHA‑1 checksum and the exact server path.
  
  It seems that maybe the .tar file itself was not recovered, but all the data about the crash was still there.
  
  source