None of which warrant annexing and invading another country, destroying civilian infrastructure, forced naturalization, etc.
It seems to me that an escalation to war was a desperate move. A weak move at that.
Your description makes it sound like the school bully got it’s feelings hurt as everyone started calling them names in the yard. Knowing that it’s days of influence are behind them, the next day the bully returned to school with a gun…
Bloomcole@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Sounds like you deepththroated the propaganda BS.
Ansd all the rest sounds like frustration from a Russophobe that can’t get over NATO and the western vasals losing.
Anyway, not worth my time responding to nonsense.
lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 10 hours ago
Keep yourself together now.
I have no hand in this game. I just see the basic facts. One of them is the invader. The other is the invaded. Regardless of what else is occurring, nothing has convinced me that the invaders were were doing it out of goodness of their hearts. Being on Lemmy I’ve heard a lot from all sides. I’m not on anyone’s side but I can tell you the invaders were the aggressor. You can paint whatever picture you want, but it’ll always be one invaded the other.
Bloomcole@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
You’re like those hasbara snakes who starts counting from oct 7 you start counting from when Russia finally intervened.
Where were all those people when those nazis burnt 47 people alive bcs they protested the coup in Odessa in 2014?.
And somehow they missed the 8 years of ethnic cleansing and bombing of civilians too.
Typical western hypocrites with their selective indignaton.
Bye now
lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 1 hour ago
The sad thing is that people think things like that warrants all out war. How many more people need to die in order to prevent people from dieing? It’s a fallacy, and I don’t believe for a second that this war is based on saving lives.