Comment

Comment on Tesla loses Autopilot wrongful death case in $329 million verdict

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

Have you even read what happened? The driver dropped his phone and wasn’t watching the road but instead was rummaging around on the ground looking for his phone, while having his foot on the accelerator manually accelerating. Autopilot was supposedly turned off because of the manual acceleration.

source

Sort:hotnew top

freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
That text you italicized so proudly, is what Tesla CLAIMS happened. Did you know Tesla repeatedly told the court that they did not have the video and data that had been captured seconds before the crash, until a forensics expert hired by the PLAINTIFFS found the data, showing Tesla had it the entire time?

Gee, why would Tesla try to hide that data if it showed the driver engaged the accelerator? Why did the plaintiffs have to go to extreme efforts to get that data?

A jury of 12 saw that evidence, you didn’t, but hey, keep on glazin’.

source
- NateNate60@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Please read the article. I hate when people upvote bullshit just because it says things they like to hear. I dislike Elon Musk as much as anyone else, but the jury’s findings were this:
  
  The driver is ⅔ responsible for the crash because of his negligent driving.
  
  The fact that the driver did in fact keep his foot on the accelerator was accepted by the jury.
  
  The jury accepted that the driver was reaching for his cell phone at the time of the crash.
  
  Evidence in court showed that the speed of the car was about 100 km/h. Keep in mind that this incident occurred in the Florida Keys where there are no high-speed expressways. I couldn’t find info on where exactly this happened, but the main road in the area is US Route 1, which close to the mainland is a large four-lane road with occasional intersections, but narrows into a two-lane road for most of the distance.
  
  The jury found Tesla ⅓ liable because it deemed that it had sold a faulty product. For international readers, in the US, a company that sells a product which is defective during normal use is strictly liable for resulting damages.
  
  Obviously Tesla plans to appeal but it is normal for everyone to appeal in these sorts of cases. Many appeals get shot down by the appellate court.
  
  source
- FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  I would reply but this other guys said it all.
  
  source
diffaldo@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
U believe everything elon says.

source
- FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  You do realise that the guy who crashed admitted in court that he was rummaging around for his dropped phone and wasn’t even looking at the road when the crash happened, right?
  
  source