Comment on OpenAI confirms that AI writing detectors don’t work
stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 1 year agoThe findings were for GAN models, not GAN like components though. That’s bad science right there.
Comment on OpenAI confirms that AI writing detectors don’t work
stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 1 year agoThe findings were for GAN models, not GAN like components though. That’s bad science right there.
PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It doesn’t matter. Even the training process makes it pretty much impossible to tell these things apart.
And if we do find a way to distinguish, we’ll immediately incorporate that into the model design in a GAN like manner, and we’ll soon be unable to distinguish again.
stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Which is why hardcoded fingerprints/identifications are required to identify the individual as a speaker rather than as an AI vs Human. Which is what we’re ultimately agreeing on here outside of the pedantics of the article and scientific findings:
Trying to find the model who is supposed to be human as an AI is counter intuitive. They’re direct opposites if one works, both can’t be exist in this implementation.
The hard part will obviously be making sure that such a “fingerprint” wouldn’t be removable which will take some wild math and out of the box thinking I’m sure.
Tough problem!