Comment on Microsoft suddenly bans LibreOffice developer's email account, blocks appeal

• gi1242@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  codeberg is owned by a nonprofit. highly recommend it

  source
• derpgon@programming.dev ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  They probably meant purely self hosted. You can self hosted Gitea, Forgejo, GitLab, and probably many others.

  source

  • trublu@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    git (by itself) is no harder to host than SSH.

    source

    • derpgon@programming.dev ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      I wouldn’t say it is particularly easy to setup, not easier than using a Docker image at least.

      source

      • msage@programming.dev ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Gitea (and hopefully Forgejo as well) really is.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• PushButton@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I host my main repository on my “lab server” at home, I got a copy on codeberg, and my public repo are mirrored on github.

  I specify in the github description that’s a mirror with a link to codeberg.

  Github is the little outcast kid of the bunch…

  source
• bss03@infosec.pub ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Self-hosted GitLab is what GNOME and Debian chose to do.

  I still use the main GitLab for most things.

  repo.or.cz provides just git hosting.

  It’s also relatively easy to just self-host Git, though permissions can be wonky, at least last time I tried.

  I can’t recommend Darcs. Luckily I don’t see MS (or any other corp) being able to take over core Git development. I really should try Pijul again, but least time I played with it, the history/branch visualization (which you can do without, but I really like to have) was actually still worse than Darcs.

  source
• DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Or self-host if that’s feasible, MAS has been self-hosting for a while now, for example.

  source
• Cocodapuf@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Oh man, I hate the whole git system so much, it was like the worst part of coding.

  source