No, they definitely wanted a theocracy, but none of them had the numbers for it to be the theocracy they wanted, so thry settled on a solution and made damn sure it wouldn’t be anyone elses theocracy by putting it in the constitution.
Thats why it’s a ‘religiously neutral’ state with special privileges for religion, rather than a secular state with free exercise of religion where doing so does not violate laws-an idea proposed and shot down at the time.
AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Could you cite some sources for this please? Seriously.
outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 days ago
No, don’t care enough, and studies have shown rigorous citations tend to reduce persuasiveness of an argument in most contexts.
But you can look if you want.
AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Yeah that’s what I thought. Lol.
outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 days ago
Yeah i didn’t think you actuwlly wanted to know.