Comment on Wyoming to host massive AI data center using more electricity than all Wyoming homes combined
AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 5 days ago
I’m starting to think this is how they ease us into accepting the argument they need to grind us up for biofuel.
“Sorry kids, it turns out deregulation of nuclear safety and all these small modular nuclear reactors we built still isn’t enough to power the data centers.”
“Good news, we have this new idea: You know how there’s just way too many of you bc we’ve been banning birth control methods and spreading misinformation about declining birth rates? And there’s also not enough food bc of tariffs and a lack of available labor to harvest all those crops we let rot?”
To be fair, in exchange we will still get to enjoy terrible AI generated art and music.
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 5 days ago
What misinformation? Every expert on the subject is agreeing that we’re at or below replacement rate.
AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 5 days ago
I mean my opinion is if your plan is to take away everybody’s healthcare, collapse the economy, close public schools, and decrease quality of life in general, plus do all these other crazy things that put the mother’s life at risk, why would it be a good idea to encourage as many new births as possible?
Also, I know n=1 but I really wanted to have another kid last year, but put it off specifically bc of the crazy laws Republicans started passing that put maternal health at risk. Honestly, I’m relieved I didn’t bc the economy has gotten so bad since then. Now when I read stories about brain dead women being forced to be kept alive to carry a fetus and give birth it makes me wonder if I’ll ever want to risk having another baby.
I think it’s dishonest to pretend that current birthrates in the U.S. at least aren’t reflecting many women’s fears about giving birth.
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 5 days ago
I wasn’t referring to the US in particular, but global birth rates.
science.org/…/population-tipping-point-could-arri…