It wasn’t even necessarily a bad idea given property growth, but it will be interesting to see what happens if they can’t stop population decline
Comment on Too bad we can't have good public transportation
umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 day agoi don’t think their intention is to keep them empty. not the worst thing to spend co2 on.
AA5B@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Their intention was to bolster the economy with busy work, but that’s not a long term solution.
umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
busywork making houses ahead of time is pretty good tbh.
id take that over ai or some shit.
Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 day ago
That’s comparing Apples to Shampoo. To completely different concepts and it’s not an either/or situation.
umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
it really isn’t. both give out emissions, one of them is housing.
its like complaining farming for food ruins the environment.
Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Houses don’t stand long on their own. It takes a significant amount of time and money to keep these things from filling up with mold or collapsing.