This is a fusion reactor, I’ll believe its making energy instead of consuming it when someone manages to get one to be net energy positive
Comment on Startup Claims Its Fusion Reactor Concept Can Turn Cheap Mercury Into Gold
antler@feddit.online 15 hours agoThis article says (5 tonnes/yr) per GW produced. It's a fusion reactor, so it's making electricity, not consuming it.
At $0.05/kWh, 1 GWh of electricity is $438 million. At $3400/troy ounce, 5 tonnes of gold is $545 million. So that jives with the company's estimate on the article that the sale of gold could double their revenue.
All bunk, of course
captainlezbian@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
antler@feddit.online 5 hours ago
Sure - they're claiming to do two very difficult things simultaneously (net positive fusion and transmute mercury to gold at scale) which makes me even more skeptical. It's like saying "Not only can pigs fly, but we've taught them to simultaneously do calculus."
Steve@startrek.website 1 hour ago
How much new gold is mined annually? Would this amount affect the price?