Comment on Women Dating Safety App 'Tea' Breached, Users' IDs Posted to 4chan
outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days agoScroll up.
Comment on Women Dating Safety App 'Tea' Breached, Users' IDs Posted to 4chan
outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days agoScroll up.
JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 days ago
This was your explanation.
I’m good faith, I assumed the best by saying this.
Rather than agree with me, you said this and refused to elaborate, going so far as to tell me to interpret as I like. When I only have two possible interpretations, one positive and one negative, I don’t know what else you’d want me take away other than the negative.
So I clarified, in good faith, it you meant the negative thing.
You were vague and refused to give any explanation. I thought it might be two things. When I asked if it was one of them, your response seems to heavily imply it wasn’t that one, but refuse to give whatever third thing it might be.
So… What is it? Because you’re saying that I am “not making an effort to understand” when I am in fact bending over backwards to give you benefit of the doubt and understand what you mean. You say communication has two sides and you’re done trying to uphold mine when I am desperately seeking clarification on what you said but you just refuse to provide it.
outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
Read what i said.
JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 days ago
I did and I’m asking for clarification.
outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
You’re in luck! I already provided some!