Tattorack@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Human stories/word/memory is incredibly fallible (be it because of how flawed humans are either biologically or behaviourally) that nothing outside of law enforcement uses human stories/word/memory as reliable evidence.
So no, testifying under oath will not be considered as evidence to anyone who values provable, testable fact.
Rooskie91@discuss.online 1 week ago
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3502
Tattorack@lemmy.world 1 week ago
And the award for “not reading or understanding what I wrote” goes to…