Comment on Hot take: 3D printing toys kinda sucks
squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 month agoThe fragile part is easily fixed by changing the print material and/or infill percentage. You’re right on all other points though.
You can make it clunky, but then it’s not appealing any more. That’s why I said that it’s a trade-off between clunky and not interesting on the one side and fragile and not durable on the other side.
infill percentage
Btw, perimeters do a huge amount more for stability than infill.
3d Printing can lose it’s luster over time if you don’t make the effort of learning 3d CAD software and making new designs. -This is my current struggle as FreeCAD is a painful piece of software to use.
I’ve been 3D printing since 7 years now, and I mostly design the things I print myself. For functional parts and prototyping, 3D printing is amazing. I am specifically talking about toys here.
You can make it clunky, but then it’s not appealing any more.
Using pctg and more infill doesn’t make a 3d printed object clunky. It only makes it stronger.
For example a benchy in pctg is so strong that it’s physically impossible to break anything but the smokestack with your bare hands. Print in TPU and it’s completely indestructible to bare hands.
Infill doesn’t really improve strenght that much, perimeters work far better.
But any 3D printed object that has that much space for more infil/perimeters is already clunky.
Compare a benchy to an average toy figurine. The benchy is super clunky compared to most non-toddler toys my kids have.
Infill doesn’t improve strength linearly but it does improve it.
Compare a benchy to an average toy figurine.
I don’t know what figurines you are printing. Could you link to one?
And TPU makes anything indestructible.
NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
Fair enough. I guess I can’t relate to that.