Comment on X updates its Terms to prohibit crawling/scraping of its data
olympicyes@lemmy.world 1 year agoIt’s not even clear that it’s illegal to scrape publicly available data, so I don’t know what the TOS would be enforcing.
Comment on X updates its Terms to prohibit crawling/scraping of its data
olympicyes@lemmy.world 1 year agoIt’s not even clear that it’s illegal to scrape publicly available data, so I don’t know what the TOS would be enforcing.
coffee_poops@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
It didn’t have to be illegal for them to sue you for violating its policies. It would be a civil suit for damages.
Eranziel@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Lol, then they would have to demonstrate that there were damages. The worst a TOS violation will get you is a ban.
kometes@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Bandwidth costs.
MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 1 year ago
Peanuts.
coffee_poops@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Unfortunately, they have more money to blow on legal fees. The threat of a suit is enough to keep most perks from fucking around and finding out.
Salix@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Would it be violating policy if the scrapper only took the public data and never actually signed the ToS since they didn’t make an account?