They said not generally intelligent, which is a specific and important property of AGI, not AI. In the tic tac toe example, the AI is intelligent (can play tic tac toe), but this intelligence cannot be generalised to playing chess, appreciating art, whatever the general measures may be.
Comment on We need to start calling it Simulater Intelligence (SI): here's why:
TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com 1 week agoBruh you just said that AI isn’t “I”. That’s the entire point of the OP
Shteou@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 1 week ago
No I didn’t. I said that they’re not generally intelligent.