Uuuh, what is that example supposed to show me exactly? That the chat got moved to a new one?
Comment on PieFed.World is now open
Rooki@lemmy.world 4 days agoI had sadly the opposite experience as a developer. He bends the rules, the code of conduct to his will so that he stays in the “right”.
He disregards any improvements to the codes style ( formatting, styling, linting ) and when you point that out you just get the lemmy devs treatment. I mentioned, the code is a mess. He went on rampage declining any attempts to “untangle” or format the code. And he simply said “Go away and dont come back”.
One example: codeberg.org/…/b341c2d4adf40147c34b100fbace886862…
Carighan@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Rooki@lemmy.world 2 days ago
No the other part the moving of the chat is a little bit controversial too. But that is ok. The other change in that commit
AbnormalHumanBeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.space 4 days ago
Ah, I am sad to hear that. And sorry that has been your experience.
As only an amateur coder, I can’t weigh in how serious the issue is, but I’m gonna take your word for it, without any other person involved adding input. I hope it’ll end up in a state, where the project can still sustain its growth in both features and users.
Rooki@lemmy.world 4 days ago
I hope that too for Piefed. But if he continues his disregard of developer. He should have kept it close source.
Jerry@feddit.online 4 days ago
This is all sour grapes.
I've read your interaction with him, and, frankly, if I were moderating a community where you incessantly carried on over insignificant details, continuing to question things after you got your answer (sea lioning), insisting on focusing on nothing, and never ever stopping, I'd block you too, and I've only blocked 2 people in my entire life as a mod.
Now you're in here trying to malign him, for revenge, for shutting you down so he could get work done and he can focus on important work instead of debating you over never-ending trivial topics.
He is the opposite of the image you are trying to give him.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
For people interested: chat.piefed.social/#narrow/channel/4-developers/t…
Rooki@lemmy.world 4 days ago
I mean i gave him the changes to his feet and he kicked them away. I know it were small changes but if i have to argue around for 4-5 session to implement basic formatting ( a one and done thing ). I would blick him too.
Jerry@feddit.online 4 days ago
My understanding is that your one PR broke logins, and it took maybe 5 days for someone else to fix the code? Maybe your changes that were kicked away just weren't so good after all, or trusted?
elbarto777@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Got any links where we can see this happening? (I’m just curious - though maybe it’s easy to look up on Codeberg…)
Rooki@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Ahh yes, that is another risk factor of him. He never tests it. I guess he always goes for guts instincts. ( As there is no CI tests or any type hints ).
And again we speak of FORMATTING pr’s those risky formatting pr’s i guess he tested that? and somehow found that it didnt worked?
Just to be clear, i fixed a lot of bugs already too. E.g. Mastodon login never even worked ONCE, i implemented that to the end.
With his merge first fix later attitude, for little bit more established servers its killing argument: Oh yeah feature X broke because no one tested it before.
My PRs were in good faith. I was ok with constructive feedback ( e.g. change this, change that ) but dismissing ones PR MULTIPLE times. With almost none real reason other than “Opiniated Formatting” ( where none exists )