Comment on AI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon study
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 6 days agoWhy are you giving it data. It’s a chat and language tool. It’s not data based. You need something trained to work for that specific use. I think Wolfram Alpha has better tools for that.
davidagain@lemmy.world 6 days ago
Because there’s a button for that.
This thing that you said… It’s false.
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 5 days ago
There’s a sleep button on my laptop. Doesn’t mean I would use it.
I’m just trying to say you’re saying the feature that everyone kind of knows doesn’t work. Chatgpt is not trained to do calculations well.
davidagain@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Again with dismissing the evidence of my own eyes!
I wasn’t asking it to do calculations, I was asking it to put the data into a super formulaic sentence. It was good at the first couple of rows then it would get stuck in a rut and start lying. It was crap. A seven year old would have done it far better, and if I’d told a seven year old that they had made a couple of mistakes and to check it carefully, they would have done.
Again, I didn’t read it in a fucking article, I read it on my fucking computer screen, so if you’d stop fucking telling me I’m stupid for using it the way it fucking told me I could use it, or that I’m stupid for believing what the media tell me about LLMs, when all I’m doing is telling you my own experience, you’d sound a lot less like a desperate troll or someone who is completely unable to assimilate new information that differs from your dogma.
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 5 days ago
What does I give it data to put in a formulaic sentence.
Why not just share the details. I often find a lot of people saying it’s doing crazy things and never like to share the details. It’s very similar to discussing things with Trump supporters who do the same shit when pressed on details about stuff they say occurs