Comment on Firefox is fine. The people running it are not

• lime@feddit.nu ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  yeah smaller languages have taken longer to adapt to that change, because it started in the anglophone world and the concepts of gendered language don’t translate well. it’s like how the word “man” in english used to mean “human” and not be gendered at all, and when language is updated to the remove the now gendered word and then translated, the translation stops making any sense because the context of a word is so different.

  i always give massive leeway when language is involved, because the culture around progressive language is basically 99% centred on the US.

  source

  • cygnus@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Not really. Mandarin for example has different characters for “he” and “she”, but they are homophones so you can’t tell who’s who in spoken language. Hungarian doesn’t have gendered pronouns and Finnish doesn’t either (actually, now that I think of it, that may be where you borrowed yours - isn’t it “hen” too?)

    source

    • lime@feddit.nu ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      i’m not really talking about the grammar, but about the cultural meanings of the words. there may be implied gender in a mode of speaking even in a language without gendered pronouns. my grandmother would always assume people i was talking about were male if i didn’t use a gendered pronoun (like i would be talking about a colleague telling me something funny) because that’s the “cultural default” still.

      and i actually don’t know where we got “hen” from. i do know that it was not originally meant to be an actual gender-neutral pronoun, but as a placeholder where gender is unknown or unimportant. it was created to replace the more cumbersome “han/hon” in legal texts, and not meant to use to refer to specific people. but we do that anyway because it helps adoption.

      looking it up it does seem to be taken from finnish! i learned something.

      source