Comment on AI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon study
surph_ninja@lemmy.world 4 days agoAgain, you only say it’s a moving target to dispel anything favorable towards AI. Then you do a complete 180 when it’s negative reporting on AI. Makes your argument meaningless, if you can’t even stick to your own point.
chaonaut@lemmy.4d2.org 4 days ago
I mean, I argue that we aren’t anywhere near AGI. Maybe we have a better chatbot and autocomplete than we did 20 years, but calling that AI? It doesn’t really track, does it? With how bad they are at navigating novel situations? With how much time, energy and data it takes to eek out just a tiny bit more model fitness? Sure, these tools are pretty amazing for what they are, but general intelligences, they are not.
surph_ninja@lemmy.world 4 days ago
No one’s claiming these are AGI. Again, you keep having to deflect to irrelevant arguments.
chaonaut@lemmy.4d2.org 4 days ago
So, are you discussing the issues with LLMs specifically, or are you trying to say that AIs are more than just the limitations of LLMs?