Comment on Ethical frameworks are detrimental to Scientific Study because Science is by nature unethical.

<- View Parent
Arkouda@lemmy.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

You could’ve said “science is unethical by nature”, or “science is, by nature, unethical”, with commas. Those would be well formulated sentences, which would be easier to read and make sense of.

You understood exactly what I meant.

About the questions: do you oppose all ethical guidelines in science? Are there any you’re fond of? Or should science be completely unimpeded, regardless of who it damages, or what purpose it serves? Can you give any examples?

I don’t oppose ethical guidelines because they are required to keep Scientific Study in check. I never stated that Science did not need ethical frameworks, I said they are detrimental to Scientific Study. Ethical frameworks hold back Study because of the damage it can do. That doesn’t mean progress is not slowed because of those safe guards.

If Scientific study is ethical, why do we require ethical frame works to keep Scientific study from being unethical?

As I said, very questionable.

It is only questionable because of the numerous assumptions you made about me as a person, followed by engaging me in bad faith because of those assumptions.

source
Sort:hotnewtop