Net Neutrality only applies to ISPs. Endpoints can do whatever they want.
Comment on Senate confirms Biden FCC nominee, finally giving Democrats a 3-2 majority
amazing2@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I’m sorry I can’t keep track. Are the democrats and progressives for net neutrality or are they for removing dangerous misinformation and hateful non progressive ideas?
phillaholic@lemm.ee 1 year ago
vector_zero@lemmy.world 1 year ago
non progressive ideas
Yeah, let’s censor anyone who isn’t on my team!
Sounds an awful lot like fascism to me.
reversebananimals@lemmy.world 1 year ago
“Anything that doesn’t support my right wing bullshit is facism”.
Save your troll Republican bullshit. No one wants to hear it.
Foggyfroggy@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It’s ok, reading takes time and practice. Keep at it!
WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 year ago
🏅
amazing2@lemm.ee 1 year ago
But with net neutrality it’s harder to remove sites like KiwiFarms. Like you can write to the hosts and make a stink but as we’ve seen in this example they can find ways to remain online or they can even conceivably host the site themselves.
But if ISPs can simply restrict access to hateful sites…
TigrisMorte@kbin.social 1 year ago
100% false, my dear Mr FUD
MinusPi@yiffit.net 1 year ago
Do you really think ISPs will prioritize that over maximizing profit with “fast lanes”?
Tayb@lemmy.world 1 year ago
…then whoever defines “hateful” determines what the rest of us can view, and ISPs aren’t even held accountable when they do stupid shit now.
ram@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
You literally don’t know what “Net Neutrality” means, and I don’t have the energy to explain it when you’re obviously not the type to listen.