we havnt tapped into geothermal like scifi does, we have the other ones though.
[deleted]
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 months ago
NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 8 months ago
[deleted]rakete@feddit.org 8 months ago
Geothermal very often uses fracking, too. Difference might only be a bit higher depth it’s used in.
cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 8 months ago
Except that nuclear is not economically viable.
0x0@lemmy.zip 8 months ago
Give it the same subsidies Big Oil has then… and i’d rather have clean energy that “economically viable” dirty energy.
Tja@programming.dev 8 months ago
Huh? France seems to be doing OK.
cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 8 months ago
I should mention, that building new nuclear reactors is not financially a viable option.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 months ago
I didn’t mention nuclear
cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 8 months ago
You didnt but the person you replied to
HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
Then why did it take until 1859 for human population to start trending up and reach 8 billion?
I’ll help you: oil. The ancient Romans had geothermal, wide, tide, solar, and hydro as well.
They had the exact same energy we do now. The difference is we have power, they didn’t.
I’ll help you again. You can’t fertilize crops with electricity, or make plastic.
Bytemeister@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Let me help you.
HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
LOL. You can NOT be serious.
How will you FEED all these people?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Revolution
" and the widespread use of chemical fertilizers"
You can NOT sustain our present human population with sunshine and puppies. Vaccines or not.
You seriously misunderstand just about everything.
Bytemeister@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Ah, chemical fertilizer must be made with crude oil and natural gas! And we must have started using those in the mid 1800s!
No, wait. Both of those are wrong.
You know what else you can’t sustain a human population with? A planet with no fresh water at a toxic atmosphere.
Soup@lemmy.world 8 months ago
The ancient romans also didn’t have solar panels, and actually hydro and wind were totally used in these little things called watermills and windmills. I wouldn’t be surprised if they figured out geothermal heating, too. The difference is that you can simply light oil on fire and that’s easy when you otherwise have a lower level of technology and aren’t ready for better, more advanced ways of generating power.
You’re none too bright, huh?
HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
Yes, please describe how that solar panel came into being. Try it without the fossil fuel foundation of every single item we use. Everything from the rubber tires of the delivery trucks to the food the workers eat.
You are blind to what’s around you. If you think we’re going to support 8 billion people living a Western lifestyle without fossil fuels, I’m afraid it’s not me who isn’t bright.
How do you support our present industrial civilization with windmills and watermills? We already had these, why did we give them up?
You’re completely oblivious.
“better, more advanced ways of generating power.”
But we don’t. We don’t “generate” power. We harvest energy. And once our little geological energy reserve is drawn down, how do you plan on keeping our present arrangements going?
You haven’t explained how you plan to make fertilizers, concrete, plastics, with electricity? And you don’t simply “light oil on fire”… Where did the iron come from to make engines? Coal, oh yeah.
You also think we’ll just spin copper wire and rare earth magnets from sunshine…
Please go back to AI vibe coding.
Soup@lemmy.world 8 months ago
You understand that without those wind and water mills that oil couldn’t have become a thing, right? Like I said, oil was a great way to bridge the gap because it is relatively easy to use but it shouldn’t be our end-goal. Having oil for producing things made of it is certainly important but we’d have a lot more to go around for those purposes if we stopped using it for inefficient things like so many personal vehicles, wasteful plastic packaging, and a myriad other things that we just don’t need it for. It’s done its time, it’s time we scaled back and moved on.
We didn’t give up water or wind mills, either. Canada has so many hydro-electric dams that we literally call home electricity “hydro” and wind farms are only getting bigger and better.
We don’t need oil to make concrete. It’s portland cement(limestone powder), water, and variously sized aggregates and it’s been around for a loooooong time in one form or another. The machinery used to create it does not need to run on fossil fuels. You may be thinking of asphalt, but even then maybe if we didn’t unnecessarily obliterate our roads with constant heavy vehicle traffic we’d be able to keep them for longer and not need to constantly pour resources into barely keeping them alive or refreshing them far too often.
For someone with such a raging erection for oil you’d think you’d be more concerned about reducing our dependency on it so that we don’t waste this precious, finite resource.