Comment on Solar + Battery (covering 97% of demand) is now cheaper than coal and nuclear
BussyCat@lemmy.world 3 days agoVogtle’s numbers are incredibly biased considering they made an entire design and then had to redo it halfway through that’s not a realistic cost that can be expected for future projects. We also have vogtles design be approved now so that new plants can be built for a fraction of the cost. Also where did you see they did amortization of solar?
booly@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
I’m just familiar with Lazard’s LCOE methodology. The linked paper talks about LCOE, so that’s just how that particular cost analysis works.