Comment

Comment on Up to half of the earth's population doesn't have an inner monologue, up to half of the earth has never had a shower thought

Opinionhaver@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

I refuse to believe this statistic. The only way to study this is by asking people and I bet most simply aren’t aware that they do have it. I didn’t pay much attention to it either untill I started meditating and now I’m painfully aware of it.

source

Sort:hotnew top

HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
In addition to in-depth interviews, one of the primary methods used in the study was for volunteers to carry a timer that would go off randomly and they were to journal what they were thinking at the time

The thoughts of someone without an inner monologue are not the same as someone with an inner monologue

source
- Opinionhaver@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  That’s still just asking people, which isn’t exactly the most scientific method. If you were to stop me and ask what I was thinking, a lot of the time I wouldn’t be able to tell you - but that doesn’t mean I wasn’t thinking. Thinking without being consciously aware of it is basically what I’m doing all day, every day. It’s mostly when I try to just be and let the world come to me that I become aware of how quickly I get lost in thought.
  
  source
  - HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    Probably a good thing they asked volunteers interested in the study to do it instead of someone such as yourself, who isn’t.
    
    I remember the researcher saying that it took some time for the participants to get used to the routine of being mindful of their thoughts and journaling at the drop of a hat
    
    I know I wouldn’t want to do that either
    
    source
    Opinionhaver@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    
    Probably a good thing they asked volunteers interested in the study to do it instead of someone such as yourself, who isn’t.
    
    Ignoring the ad hominem, I don’t see how that’s supposed to be an argument against what I said - it only highlights that the participants weren’t even randomly selected. If you’re cherry-picking participants, there’s even less reason to generalize the findings to the entire population.
    
    As I mentioned in my other comment: you could just as easily run a study asking people to self-report whether they have a blind spot in their visual field, and everyone would say no - and everyone would be wrong.
    
    Just because someone isn’t aware of something doesn’t mean it isn’t there. I’m not asking you to change your opinion - I’m simply saying I’m highly skeptical of it.
    
    source