Comment on NSW to ban people from appealing if working with children check denied

• TimePencil@infosec.exchange ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  @Taleya

  Thanks.

  However, that report relates to 'filicide', and this thread is discussing 'working with children'.

  Are you aware of any studies that show that women (who are NOT the mother of a child victim) "are more likely to just straight up kill kids".

  The report you provided seems related to 'domestic violence', and unrelated to the 'child care' sector.

  source

  • Taleya@aussie.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Your claims were not restricted to childcare, so i’m not playing move the goalposts.

    source

    • TimePencil@infosec.exchange ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      @Taleya

      I've not moved the goal posts.

      This thread relates to 'working with children' and policies regarding background checks of those who do.

      One toot read, in part, "Statistically women are the outlier offenders, around 5% or less for known sexual abuse."

      You replied, "Statistically, women are more likely to just straight up kill kids so there goes your harm mitigation theory."

      I asked for more information regarding your "statistics" and you provided a report related to 'filicide' in the context of 'domestic violence'. This is outside the scope of any "working with children" checks.

      You wrote, "The original claims were not restricted to childcare..."

      I haven't moved the goal posts at all.

      This isn't a game. I am genuinely interested if you know of any statistical evidence that women, in a capacity for which they require a "working with children" background check, "are more likely to just straight up kill kids".

      source