Comment on Kids are making deepfakes of each other, and laws aren’t keeping up
atomicorange@lemmy.world 1 month agoHow is it different for the victim? What if they can’t tell if it’s a deepfake or a real photo of them?
Comment on Kids are making deepfakes of each other, and laws aren’t keeping up
atomicorange@lemmy.world 1 month agoHow is it different for the victim? What if they can’t tell if it’s a deepfake or a real photo of them?
BombOmOm@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It’s clear sexual harassment. However, you can’t just claim something has underage nudity when the nudity is of an adult model.
atomicorange@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yes, it’s sexual abuse of a child, the same way taking surreptitious locker room photos would be. There’s nothing magical about a photograph of real skin vs a fake. The impact to the victim is the same. The impact to the viewer of the image is the same. Arguing over the semantic definition of “abuse” is getting people tangled up here. If we used the older term, “child porn” people wouldn’t be so hesitant to call this what it is.