Todays AI is clippy on steroids. It’s not intelligent or creative. You can’t feed it physics and astronomy books with the equation for C and tell it to create the equation for C. It’s fancy autocorrect, and it’s a waste of compute and energy.
Comment on We need to stop pretending AI is intelligent
Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 day ago
That headline is a straw man, and the article really argues on General AI, which also has consciousness.
The current state of AI is definitely intelligent, but it’s not GAI.
Bullshit headline.
SupraMario@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
decarabas42@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
I think you’re misunderstanding the point the author is making. She is arguing that even the current state is not intelligent, it is merely a fancy autocorrect, it doesn’t know or understand anything about the prompts it receives, as the author stated, it can only guess at the next statistically most likely piece of information based on the data that has been fed into it. That’s not intelligence, that’s fancy autocorrect.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
But that’s not what intelligence is, that’s what consciousness is.
Intelligence is not understanding shit, it’s the ability to for instance solve a problem, so a frigging calculator has a tiny degree of intelligence, but not enough for us to call it AI.
There is simply zero doubt an AI is intelligent, claiming otherwise just shows people don’t know the difference between intelligence and consciousness.
Passing an exam is a form of intelligence.
Can a good AI pass a basic exam?
YES.
Does passing an exam require consciousness?
NO, because an exam tests abilities of intelligence, not level of consciousness.
decarabas42@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
I have to disagree that a calculator has intelligence. The calculator has the mathematical functions programmed into it, but it couldn’t use those on its own. The intelligence in your example is that of the operator of the calculator and the programmer who designed the calculator’s software.
I agree with you that the ability to pass an exam isn’t a great test for this situation. In my opinion, the major factor that would point to current state AI not being intelligent is that it doesn’t know why a given answer is correct, beyond that it is statistically likely to be correct.
Again, I think this points to the idea that knowing why an answer is correct is important. A person can know something by rote, which is what current AI does, but that doesn’t mean that person knows why that is the correct answer. The ability to extrapolate from existing knowledge and apply that to other situations that may not seem directly applicable is an important aspect of intelligence.
As an example, image generation AI knows that a lot of the artwork that it has been fed contains watermarks or artist signatures, so it would often include things that look like those in the generated piece. It knew that it was statistically likely for that object to be there in a piece of art, but not why it was there, so it could not make a decision not to include them. Maybe that issue has been removed from the code of image generation AI by now, it has been a long time since I’ve messed around with that kind of tool, but even if it has been fixed, it is not because the AI knew it was wrong and self-corrected, it is because a programmer had to fix a bug in the code that the AI model had no awareness of.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
That’s consciousness, and beyond ordinary AI. That is in the realm of General AI or Strong AI.
FourWaveforms@lemm.ee 22 hours ago
Predicting sequences of things is foundational to intelligence. In fact, it is the whole point.