Yes, the first step to determining that AI has no capability for cognition is apparently to admit that neither you nor anyone else has any real understanding of what cognition* is or how it can possibly arise from purely mechanistic computation.
Given the paramount importance of the human senses and emotion for consciousness to “happen”
Given? Given by what? Fiction in which robots can’t comprehend the human concept called “love”?
counterspell@lemmy.world 1 day ago
No it’s really not at all the same. Humans don’t think according to the probabilities of what is the likely best next word.
Zexks@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
No you think according to the chemical proteins floating around your head. You don’t even know he decisions your making when you make them.
unsw.edu.au/…/our-brains-reveal-our-choices-befor…
You’re a meat based copy machine with a built in justification box.
aesthelete@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Except of course that humans invented language in the first place. So uh, if all we can do is copy, where do you suppose language came from? Ancient aliens?
FourWaveforms@lemm.ee 19 hours ago
How could you have a conversation about anything without the ability to predict the word most likely to be best?