imho, Karakeep is more for data preservation. Readeck is for articles you want to read later. Linkwarden is for important bookmarks like online accounts, billing accounts, etc. However, there is nothing that keeps you from using either as a bookmark app.
dan@upvote.au 2 days ago
How’s it compare to Hoarder/Karakeep?
irmadlad@lemmy.world 2 days ago
_cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
Why would you say Karakeep is more for data preservation than Linkwarden? Linkwarden has all the features that Karakeep has, and more.
irmadlad@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I say that because that’s how I use the three:
Readeck: Read it later Karakeep: Data preservation Linkwarden: Important links like business accounts, online accounts, etc.
daniel31x13@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Hmm, I’d consider Linkwarden as a mix of Pocket and ArchiveBox, with collaboration functionality.
irmadlad@lemmy.world 2 days ago
That works too.
cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 2 days ago
I used linkwarden. But I don’t use their save article functionality. All I do is to use it as a bookmark manager. In that sense its a little bloated for me. Would like to try some other, please recommended.
Jason2357@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
I use good old wallabag for read it later because of how well it works in fbreader on my Kobo. Linkwarden for the bookmarks. It’s not really bloated if you think about how the archiving preserves copies of bookmarks in case the site goes down, and more crucially, allows for full text search.
EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Worse. KaraKeep was partially inspired by Linkwarden.