Comment on Judge backs AI firm over use of copyrighted books
Nomad_Scry@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day agoIf they can just steal a creator’s work, how do they suppose creators will be able to afford continuing to be creators?
Right. They think we have enough original works that the machines can just make any new creations.
😠
The companies like record studio who already own all the copyrights aren’t going to pay creators for something they already owned.
All the data has already been signed away. People are really optimistic about an industry that has consistently fucked everyone they interact with for money.
bob_omb_battlefield@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Yeah, I guess the debate is which is the lesser evil. I didn’t make the original comment but I think this is what they were getting at.
Nomad_Scry@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day ago
Absolutely. The current copyright system is terrible but an AI replacement of creators is worse.
Grimy@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
Yes precisely.
I don’t see a situation where the actual content creators get paid.
We either get open source ai, or we get closed ai where the big ai companies and copyright companies make banque.
I think people are having huge knee jerk reactions and end up supporting companies like Disney, Universal Music and Google.