Comment on Socialism is the actual teaching of Jesus
davidagain@lemmy.world 2 days agoAh, you’re one of those “Both sides” people. Gotcha.
Comment on Socialism is the actual teaching of Jesus
davidagain@lemmy.world 2 days agoAh, you’re one of those “Both sides” people. Gotcha.
MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 2 days ago
Matthew 7:13-14
davidagain@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Denying Jesus’ insistence that you should look after the poor, the widows and foreigners is aok by you, though, for some reason. “If you love me, follow my commands.” “When did we see you hungry and not feed you?” “It is harder for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven than for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle.”
You’ve corrupted a message of “no, pay your taxes and your synagogue” and “love your neighbour (meaning anyone who is in need, including foreigners, and put your money where your mouth is)” into “it’s fine to advocate for and vote for tax cuts for the wealthiest and aid cuts for those on greatest need, and incarcerating people for being foreign”.
There is no get out clause for selfishness and hatred via the ballot box as you’re claiming.
If I thought for a moment that you meant something other than that you find yourself excuses for supporting the Liar in Chief and the grand old party of selfishness, hatred and racism, I wouldn’t be calling you out on it, but you’re not just lying about Jesus’ message, you’re lying about your political neutrality which is non-existent and attempting to draw others into your duplicity and self deception.
MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 2 days ago
I’m sorry, but what exactly made you think I’m supporting the Republican party here, just because I hinted at the fact that the Democrats are no angels either? What did it matter that Democrats were in control for the last four years when grocery prices still went up by 100%?
Where did I advocate for tax cuts for the wealthy, or cutting welfare to the needy? All I said was that as far as I understand it, Jesus didn’t advocate for voting to have the government take care of your neighbor, but to do it yourself instead. Which, as far as I understand it, just means that you can’t vote your way out of your problems, you have to take personal responsibility as much as you can.
If there is someone in your life that needs more help than the government is providing, and you have the means to help them, you should do so, instead of complaining that the government isn’t doing enough. It doesn’t matter who’s in charge of the White House, what matters is what you do with what you’re given.
davidagain@lemmy.world 1 day ago
You consistently “both sides” politics and choose to see no difference between the party of hate and the party of compromise. There’s only one reason to equate the evil party with the unhelpful party.
Jesus didn’t say “justify your moral errors whilst choosing the path that reduces your tax burden” and he certainly didn’t say “it’s ok to vote for the ones that stand for almost everything I preached against, I certainly didn’t mean that the whole country should act lovingly, and your tax reducing charitable donation and your ‘charity begins at home’ excuses you from moral culpabilty if you vote for more cruelty and selfishness to wash over the whole country”
Did you think Jesus can’t see what you’re doing on the voting machine? Did you think he doesn’t know why? Do you really think he doesn’t care about the poor people that have their benefits cut so that the rich can have a tax cut?
“Weep and wail, ye rich men. You have not paid the wages of those who reap. In their anguish they have cried out to the Lord, and he has heard them.”
But no, sure, God has no opinion on kings and leaders and doesn’t care if they are the enemy of truth and justice. That’s the message of whatever Bible you’re not reading, I’m sure. /s