did we read the same article? this author was overtly critical of trump and never mentioned democrats.
Comment on OSTP Has a Choice to Make: Science or Politics?
Boomkop3@reddthat.com 19 hours ago
Just going by this article I can’t quite tell whether either party is good intentions. Except for that the writer here does not
acosmichippo@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
Boomkop3@reddthat.com 10 hours ago
She names Trump’s points explicitly, but doesn’t go beyond “the best practices of this and that institution”.
I can’t say they’re wrong, I expect a scientific institution to have some integrity to say the least. But either she’s too lazy to look them up, or she’s not quoting any for a different reason
AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 11 hours ago
UCS definitely has good intentions.
I just don’t have faith in the Trump OSTP to actually look at the evidence or even bother reading a letter to consider their next steps.
They’ve been planning this for a long time. If they can’t capitalize on it, they will be getting rid of it.
Boomkop3@reddthat.com 10 hours ago
Ye I expect so, I don’t like the way this author just doesn’t bother explaining her points. She just states that she disagrees and says they should be left to their own rules.
Which is probably fine, but that’s just lazy or she’s not mentioning the difference for another reason