Comment on Why is the manosphere on the rise? UN Women sounds the alarm over online misogyny
Fedditor385@lemmy.world 1 day agoWell, after your 2nd post with the same thing I thought this is how you wanna communicate.
Comment on Why is the manosphere on the rise? UN Women sounds the alarm over online misogyny
Fedditor385@lemmy.world 1 day agoWell, after your 2nd post with the same thing I thought this is how you wanna communicate.
barsoap@lemm.ee 1 day ago
Let’s try this again: If, as you say “women do empathy, men do resilience”, then why should childcare be 70:30? Why not 50:50 so the kids get taught empathy and resilience in equal measure? Then: How can you even be empathetic if you lack in the resilience department?
Fedditor385@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Because more women than men want to be in daycare, it’s unrealistic to expect the same amount of men want to be in daycase as women. And the gender ratio of employees doesn’t mean thats also the ratio of what kids will take away from this. Does this mean that in daycare without any men the kids have only 50% of the care they need? Of course not.
Again, ONE DOESNT EXCLUDE THE OTHER. Everyone has empathy and resilience, but so far in general women tend to be better at empathy and men in resilience. Why force one to do both, when both can thrive in what they do better?
barsoap@lemm.ee 1 day ago
I don’t expect it. It is you who is insisting for no discernible reason that 70:30 is, and I quote, “ideal”. It is you who is saying “guys get some other job I don’t care how much you want the job and how good you’d be at it, we already have a quota of 30%”.
Fedditor385@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
Did I say anywhere that the 30:70 means a really had 30:70 cap and that nobody after that is free to join or leave the job? Did I say that the 30% is exactly, not more not less, the amount of men who want to for ex. work in daycare?