Sure but I don’t see how people can think certain bans should exist and not others. Sawn off shotguns have been banned for as long as I’ve ever known, yet people don’t question it. The reasoning is they could be dangerous to others on accident. Yet if you take any round .223 with a fmj (cheapest format to buy) it’s going straight through your wall, and through the entire apartment across the hall. So when you fire 3 shots towards the door they are trying to go through, most people with adrenaline or freaking out enough to think a gun is necessary at that point in time, 2 of those rounds are going into the next residence. Even the 1 that hits the person very well might go straight through.
Guy stacked sheet rock up in a row and they went through .223 - 17 .308 - 20 30-06 - 23
Granted with gaps between them the wobble will make it more like 3-4… so anyone in the living room/dining room or if the bedroom is towards the wall facing the hall… Is possibly getting a hunk of lead in them.
Hollow points almost make more sense there, as hopefully they’d split on the first sheet rock and the smaller shards may get stuck in the second, if not hopefully not have enough momentum to penetrate a person after if their lucky.
Should they ban those rifles, in my opinion no, but I think if you use one for home defense and fire a round that penetrates into another person’s residence, you should get an attempted murder charge for being irresponsible. It isn’t a moose coming in the front door. For people who believe they need home defense a 9mm hollow point will save money, be easier to navigate in close quarters and dump all the energy into stopping the person instead of going out their back. (Unfortunately for them, much more organ damage, and high chances of death). (Personally I think most should use revolvers anyways if they aren’t using it often, because 20 years from now even if it hasn’t been cleaned, it’s more than likely going to do exactly what you want it to do… while a semi automatic spring loaded contraption, may jam)
starlinguk@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Only you don’t accidentally beat someone to death with a hammer.
ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
You don’t accidentally shoot anyone either, it’s negligence.
shplane@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Let’s not get tied up in semantics but the idea that you can’t “accidentally” shoot someone is nonsense. Whether you call it negligence or not, if it’s not on purpose, then it’s an accident.
ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Accident isn’t a harsh enough word.
breecher@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
They subscribe to the NRA falsehood about “guns don’t kill people etc.”. Such people are usually lost causes.
wewbull@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
In the US a gun is more likely to kill the owner or their family than anyone else.
I’m fairly sure ethe vast majority of those are accidental.
ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Well you’d be wrong, overwhelmingly the majority of those are suicides, followed by intentional homicides, and lastly negligence (you can try and remove the negligent party’s guilt by calling them accidents all you want, but the “accident” occurs through blatant negligence every time.)
lemming741@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
It’s a lot faster to do it with a car
chonkyninja@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Speak for yourself.