I wouldn’t categorize it that way at all. It extrapolated nationality to one’s employer and religion to the law. It was unsubtle in its views of classism and such, in a way that I appreciated, but it wasn’t just doing zany things “just because”, unless you’ve got a good example that’s slipping my mind.
Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
My critique is not of the content of the writing but rather its presentation and its over reliance on what I can only call “millennial humor”.
ampersandrew@lemmy.world 3 days ago
I can’t say I follow you. I would call it satire rather “totally random”, but if you didn’t care for the writing, you didn’t care for the writing.