This is a knock them down paper by Apple justifying (to their shareholders) their non investment in LLMs. It is not a build them up paper trying for meaningful change and to create a better AI.
That’s not the only way to make meaningful change, getting people to give up on llms would also be meaningful change. This does very little for anyone who isn’t apple.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Other way around. The claimed meaningful change (reasoning) has not occurred.
communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 month ago
Meaningful change is not happening because of this paper, either, I don’t know why you’re playing semantic games with me though.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I’m trying to highlight the goal of this paper.
This is a knock them down paper by Apple justifying (to their shareholders) their non investment in LLMs. It is not a build them up paper trying for meaningful change and to create a better AI.
communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 month ago
That’s not the only way to make meaningful change, getting people to give up on llms would also be meaningful change. This does very little for anyone who isn’t apple.