Even defining reason is hard and becomes a matter of philosophy more than science. For example, apply the same claims to people. Now I’ve given you something to think about. Or should I say the Markov chain in your head is buzzing.
Even defining reason is hard and becomes a matter of philosophy more than science. For example, apply the same claims to people. Now I’ve given you something to think about. Or should I say the Markov chain in your head is buzzing.
I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
By many definitions, reasoning IS a form of pattern recognition so the lines are definitely blurred.
echodot@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
And does it even matter anyway?
For the sake of argument let’s say that somebody manages to create an AGI, does it reasoning abilities if it works anyway? No one has proven that sapience is required for intelligence, after all we only have a sample size of one, hardly any conclusions can really be drawn from that.