I’m so glad you chimed in. Everyone loves someone who starts a silly, pedantic argument for no good reason.
Not normal, just uhhh… maybe common.
Either you don’t know what normal is or common is if you think they’re different things…
FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
user224@lemmy.sdf.org 17 hours ago
Maybe. The way I understand it:
Normal is something that’s basically the way it should be, while common just refers to being of higher frequency of occurence, regularly seen.
For example: “Is police brutality normal?” vs “Is police brutality common?”
No and yes.givesomefucks@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
Normal is something that’s basically the way it should be,
That is incorrect
Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 16 hours ago
First definition from your link:
conforming to a type, standard, or regular pattern characterized by that which is considered usual, typical, or routine
I’m guessing the other person meant “the way it should be” not in a normative way but as in “the way you’d expect it to be since that’s the usual way”. That’s in line with the definition. Bottom line is both have several definitions but “normal” definitely has a very different connotation from “common”.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
I’m guessing the other person meant “the way it should be”
That’s a pretty safe guess considering they explicitly said that…
But I don’t think I’m going to make much ground explaining to you why they’re wrong either
hitmyspot@aussie.zone 17 hours ago
Cancer is not normal cell tissue, but it’s very common. They are different words, with different meanings.