I have no issues with you sticking to the facts. If you just did that, we’d have no issues, remember? It’s when you add things, remember your ninja edit to delete “radiological”? Don’t blame me for calling you out on this stuff. Or, y’know, just let me know why you like to twist things.
Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
“I have no issues with you sticking to the facts.”
wouldn’t matter if you continued to fight against the facts anyway.
good of you to recognize that.
back to your nitpicking?
how irrelevant to the facts.
Carrolade@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I’m not fighting against the facts. I’m fighting against you. You thinking everything you say is a fact without having to prove it is a you problem. Doesn’t mean I have to go along with it. Nitpicking is about facts, you know. True/false.
Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
“I’m not fighting against the facts”
you were, but you’ve seen how fruitless that is.
you can try to change the subject or pretend something is different. every comment, and i get to repeat the facts.
The US government admitted to using biological weapons on non-consenting US citizens to test the efficacy of those weapons, and no amount of your bitterness at having to learn something new can change that evidence.
Carrolade@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
Playing pretend in what way? I told you, as soon as you support your specific statements that you’ve made, or admit you were wrong, we’re cool. I don’t see what is being pretended.
Specifically, you saying “using weapons” in this case. The bacteria were not weapons. They were studying weapons, by using other bacteria that behave similar to weapons. I don’t think you actually care, but I do I’m afraid. Where in the report does it say weapons were released? Not studied, released?