it sure does if you keep pouting and asking me to distort the facts.
the facts started at the top, they’re staying the same down here.
nothing has changed, you can read the post and the sources at the top and there’s nothing you can do about their verified accuracy and the live biological agents that the US government dispersed on non-consenting US citizens.
Carrolade@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
I’m not asking you to distort anything. I’m asking you to tell me where in your sources it supports you when you said this:
Because what I read is another, much less dangerous bacteria was spread to study how spreading happened. And we can tell, too, because tons of people didn’t die, and weapons are for killing people. Make sense? Or you can just admit that you’ve been subtly twisting the truth to suit your ends.
Varyk@sh.itjust.works 19 hours ago
it doesn’t matter what kind of misdirection you try, I’m not going to help you.
you either misunderstood the source, which seems very likely, or you didn’t read the actual source, which seems even more likely.
you should read the church committee report, it’s a fascinating several hundreds of pages.
Carrolade@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
Kinda hard to call it misdirection when I’m directly quoting you from a different comment you made and asking you to either support it or admit you were twisting words around. Seems like a pretty straight direction to me, no? I mean, if you really read it, it’d be pretty easy to say where in it you got that from.
Varyk@sh.itjust.works 19 hours ago
kind of easy to call it a misdirection when you’re taking my words out of the provided context and pretending they mean something they don’t.
pretty easy to call it a misdirection when you’re avoiding the thrust of the post to try to nitpick irrelevant details.
keep swinging.