you trying to twist the words of the 1976 Senate committee hearing isn’t going to work, it’s a 50-year-old completely verified set of proof.
chemtrails were real and the US government experimented with biological weapons on people, as noted in the post.
your confusion over the evidence is completely immaterial.
Carrolade@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
My issue is your words not matching the committee’s words. Your words are the problem, and your words are what you need to defend. This careful pivot to “but the committee!!!” isn’t fooling anyone op. Defend your words. Where did the committee discuss radiological? Did I miss it somewhere perhaps?
Varyk@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
my words are accurate and sourced.
your confusion, feigned or otherwise, is your own problem.
you missed many things. or are pretending to anyway, in an effort to find a leg to stand on.
you aren’t going to be able to fabricate any valid rejection against the abundance of sourced evidence, but imagine away.
Carrolade@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I don’t have to imagine jack shit. When I challenge you to say where you got even one single line about “radiological” and you just say “it is accurate and sourced” instead of saying where exactly we can find it, you do my work for me.
It’s not hard to go “Senate subcommittee report, page xyz, go look.” Would be a lot better than “trust me bro, accurate and sourced, it’s somewhere in there I promise.”
These niche tech communities like Lemmy are not exactly full of stupid people, we know how arguments and citations work. You’ve still got a chance here to prove me wrong, you know. Just need to put the work in, assuming you’re not some random, lazy troll. Just gotta copy/paste one single piece that confirms radiological something and say where you got it, that simple.
Varyk@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
“I don’t have to imagine…”
you don’t have to, and yet you insist that your fabrications make a lick of difference in face of the abundant documented evidence of chemtrails and weapons testing.
your imagination has no bearing on the evidence.
i see now, you’ve conflated outside unethical radiological tests with the Church committee evidence here about biological and chemical testing.