Again, a dozen large scale experiments and 200 total experiments does not let you combine the two and say 200 large scale experiments. Doing so is inaccurate.
Studying the spread of one pathogen by releasing a different one is not “biological weapons attacks”.
I got all of this from your links, which would have been very hard for me to do without reading them. Your links do not say what you say. They say what I say, and I encourage everyone to read them and find that out for themselves.
Varyk@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
again, you are fabricating theories rather than accepting the verified evidence provided by The Senate, the US government and their researchers.
my links support the findings of the 1976 Senate committee hearing that exposed these biological weapons experiments on non-consenting US citizens.
The evidence, testimony, documentation and recordings are all available in the provided likes and support the findings of the Senate committee, as well as the 1976 commission hearing in its entirety, which is documented and publicly available.
Carrolade@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Now if only your links were supporting your overall message. I think the only thing we agree on is that people should read the material themselves. Most of them will not see that as strong evidence for chemtrails, I’m afraid.
Varyk@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
the supporting links for this post are from verified government and news sources, comprised entirely of official evidence, documentation and recordings.
Verified historical fact.
Carrolade@lemmy.world 2 days ago
No, this is why you keep changing your tune. A few posts ago you were talking about “biological attacks!”. Now it’s “biological experiments!” after I pointed out that you were wrong. What ever happened to radiological? You haven’t mentioned that one in awhile after including it in your earlier message, have you? Weak, op. Very weak.