Comment

Comment on lemm.ee is shutting down at the end of this month

<- View Parent

MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

By the way, I wonder if new instances will still see those. I believe not if they were posted on a lemm.ee community

source

Sort:hotnew top

FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
Your correct. Lemm.ee’s ghosts will only live on in the instances around during it’s life.

Kind of like humans after they die. You still live on in the memories of those who knew you.

source
- irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  It doesn’t have to be that way.
  
  Check FEP-ef61. codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/…/fep-ef61.md
  
  source
  - FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    I get blocked from these links I dunno why. It’s very frustrating.
    
    source
    irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    Interesting, what browser are you using?
    
    Anyway, its written in markdown.
    
    The contents of FEP-ef61.
    # FEP-ef61: Portable Objects ## Summary Portable [ActivityPub][ActivityPub] objects with server-independent IDs. ## Motivation Usage of HTTP(S) URLs as identifiers has a major drawback: when the server disappears, everyone who uses it loses their identities and data. The proposed solution should satisfy the following constraints: - User’s identity and data should not be tied to a single server. - Users should have a choice between full control over their identity and data, and delegation of control to a trusted party. - Implementing the solution in existing software should be as simple as possible. Changes to ActivityPub data model should be kept to a minimum. - The solution should be compatible with existing and emerging decentralized identity and storage systems. - The solution should be transport-agnostic. ## History Nomadic identity mechanism makes identity independent from a server and was originally part of the Zot federation protocol. Streams (2021) made nomadic accounts available via the Nomad protocol, which supported ActivityStreams serialisation. FEP-c390 (2022) introduced a decentralized identity solution compatible with ActivityPub. It enabled permissionless migration of followers between servers, but didn’t provide full data portability. ## Requirements The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC-2119][RFC-2119]. ## Identifiers An [ActivityPub][ActivityPub] object can be made portable by using an identifier that is not tied to a single server. This proposal describes a new identifier type that has this property and is compatible with the [ActivityPub] specification. ### ap:// URLs ap:// URL is constructed according to the [URI][RFC-3986] specification, but with a [Decentralized Identifier][DID] in place of the authority: text ap://did:example:123456/path/to/object?name=value#fragment-id \_/ \________________/ \____________/ \________/ \_________/ | | | | | scheme authority path query fragment - The URI scheme MUST be ap. - The authority component MUST be a valid [DID]. - The path is REQUIRED. It MUST be treated as an opaque string. - The query is OPTIONAL. To avoid future conflicts, implementers SHOULD NOT use parameter names that are not defined in this proposal. - The fragment is OPTIONAL. >[!NOTE] >ActivityPub specification [requires][ActivityPub-ObjectIdentifiers] identifiers to have an authority “belonging to that of their originating server”. The authority of ‘ap’ URL is a DID, which does not belong to any particular server. >[!WARNING] >The URI scheme might be changed to ap+ef61 in a future version of this document, because these identifiers are not intended to be used for all ActivityPub objects, but only for portable ones. ### DID methods Implementers MUST support the [did:key] method. Other DID methods SHOULD NOT be used, as it might hinder interoperability. >[!NOTE] >The following additional DID methods are being considered: did:web, did:dns, did:webvh (formerly did:tdw) and did:fedi. DID documents SHOULD contain Ed25519 public keys represented as verification methods with Multikey type (as defined in the [Controlled Identifiers][Multikey] specification). Any [DID URL][DID-URL] capabilities of a DID method MUST be ignored when working with ap:// URLs. ### Dereferencing ap:// URLs To dereference an ap:// URL, the client MUST make HTTP GET request to a gateway endpoint at [well-known] location /.well-known/apgateway. The ap:// prefix MUST be removed from the URL and the rest of it appened to a gateway URL. The client MUST specify an Accept header with the application/ld+json; profile=“https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams” media type. Example of a request to a gateway: GET https://social.example/.well-known/apgateway/did:key:z6MkrJVnaZkeFzdQyMZu1cgjg7k1pZZ6pvBQ7XJPt4swbTQ2/path/to/object ActivityPub objects identified by ap:// URLs can be stored on multiple servers simultaneously. If object identified by ap:// URL is stored on the server, it MUST return a response with status 200 OK containing the requested object. The value of a Content-Type header MUST be application/ld+json; profile=“https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams”. If object identified by ap:// URL is not stored on the server, it MUST return 404 Not Found. If object is not public, the server MUST return 404 Not Found unless the request has a HTTP signature and the signer is allowed to view the object. >[!NOTE] >This document describes web gateways, which use HTTP transport. However, the data model and authentication mechanism are transport-agnostic and other types of gateways could exist. ## Authentication and authorization Authentication and authorization are performed in accordance with [FEP-fe34] origin-based security model. The [origin][RFC-6454] of an ap:// URL is computed by the following algorithm: 1. Let uri-scheme be the ap string. 2. Let uri-host be the authority component of the URL. 3. Let uri-port be the number 0. 4. Return the triple (uri-scheme, uri-host, uri-port). And the origin of a [DID URL][DID-URL] is computed by the following algorithm: 1. Let uri-scheme be the ap string. 2. Let uri-host be the DID component of the DID URL. 3. Let uri-port be the number 0. 4. Return the triple (uri-scheme, uri-host, uri-port). Actors, activities and objects identified by ap:// URLs MUST contain [FEP-8b32] integrity proofs. Collections identified by ap:// URLs MAY contain integrity proofs. If collection doesn’t contain an integrity proof, another authentication method MUST be used. The value of verificationMethod property of the proof MUST be a [DID URL][DID-URL] where the DID matches the authority component of the ap:// URL. >[!NOTE] >This document uses terms “actor”, “activity”, “collection” and “object” according to the classification given in [FEP-2277]. ## Portable actors One identity (represented by [DID]) can control multiple actors (which are differentiated by the path component of an ap:// URL). An actor object identified by ap:// URL MUST have a gateways property containing an ordered list of gateways where the latest version of that actor object can be retrieved. Each item in the list MUST be an HTTP(S) URL with empty path, query and fragment components. The list MUST contain at least one item. Gateways are expected to be the same for all actors under a DID authority and MAY be also specified in the DID document as [services][DID-Services]. Example: json { “@context”: [ “https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams”, “https://w3id.org/security/data-integrity/v1”, “https://w3id.org/fep/ef61” ], “type”: “Person”, “id”: “ap://did:key:z6MkrJVnaZkeFzdQyMZu1cgjg7k1pZZ6pvBQ7XJPt4swbTQ2/actor”, “inbox”: “ap://did:key:z6MkrJVnaZkeFzdQyMZu1cgjg7k1pZZ6pvBQ7XJPt4swbTQ2/actor/inbox”, “outbox”: “ap://did:key:z6MkrJVnaZkeFzdQyMZu1cgjg7k1pZZ6pvBQ7XJPt4swbTQ2/actor/outbox”, “gateways”: [ “https://server1.example”, “https://server2.example” ], “proof”: { “type”: “DataIntegrityProof”, “cryptosuite”: “eddsa-jcs-2022”, “created”: “2023-02-24T23:36:38Z”, “verificationMethod”: “did:key:z6MkrJVnaZkeFzdQyMZu1cgjg7k1pZZ6pvBQ7XJPt4swbTQ2#z6MkrJVnaZkeFzdQyMZu1cgjg7k1pZZ6pvBQ7XJPt4swbTQ2”, “proofPurpose”: “assertionMethod”, “proofValue”: “…” } } ### Location hints When ActivityPub object containing a reference to another actor is being constructed, implementations SHOULD provide a list of gateways where specified actor object can be retrieved. This list MAY be provided using the gateways query parameter. Each gateway address MUST be URL-endcoded, and if multiple addresses are present they MUST be separated by commas. Example: ap://did:key:z6MkrJVnaZkeFzdQyMZu1cgjg7k1pZZ6pvBQ7XJPt4swbTQ2/actor?gateways=https%3A%2F%2Fserver1.example,https%3A%2F%2Fserver2.example This URL indicates that object can be retrieved from two gateways: - https://server1.example - https://server2.example Implementations MUST discard query parameters when comparing ap:// identifiers and treat identifiers with different query parameter values as equal. ### Inboxes and outboxes Servers and clients MUST use gateways to deliver activities to inboxes or outboxes. Servers specified in the gateways property of an actor object MUST accept POST requests to respective gateway URLs. Example: POST https://social.example/.well-known/apgateway/did:key:z6MkrJVnaZkeFzdQyMZu1cgjg7k1pZZ6pvBQ7XJPt4swbTQ2/actor/inbox Delivered activities might be not portable. If delivered activity is portable (has ap:// identifier), the server MUST verify its [FEP-8b32] integrity proof. If the server does not accept deliveries on behalf of an actor, it MUST return 405 Method Not Allowed. ActivityPub clients MAY follow [FEP-ae97][FEP-ae97] to publish activities. In this case
    
    source
    -> View More Comments