Comment on This new 40TB hard drive from Seagate is just the beginning—50TB is coming fast!
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
Imagine how long it’ll take to rebuild your raid array after one fails lol
Comment on This new 40TB hard drive from Seagate is just the beginning—50TB is coming fast!
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
Imagine how long it’ll take to rebuild your raid array after one fails lol
MangioneDontMiss@lemm.ee 3 days ago
underrated comment. i’d much rather clone a 15 tb drive than 50 tb one. Also better speeds considering the use of more drives. That said, if I can save on electricity, noise, enclosure space, and very importantly, money, it could be pretty cool.
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
I mean personally, for long term data hoarding, I dislike running anything below raidz2, and imo anything less than 5 disks in that setup is just silly and inefficient in terms of cost/benefit. So I currently have 5x16TB in raidz2. The 60% capacity efficiency kinda blows, but also I didn’t want to spend any more on rust than I did at the time, and the array is still working great, so whatever.
MangioneDontMiss@lemm.ee 3 days ago
honestly though. I kinda dislike that a 40 or 50tb mechanical drive is even a thing. What we really need is larger, more affordable solid state drives. Mechanical drives have had their place, but their limits are fairly clear at this point. And your point about rebuilding an array makes that obvious. They are just too slow. This move by seagate to make ridiculously large mechanical drives, should not be the beggining, as this article suggests. It should really be the end.
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
They’re slow, but they’re WAY more robust than most SSDs - and in terms of $/TB, it’s not even close. Especially if you’re comparing to SLC enterprise-grade.