I believe that's what some people who don't like the instance claim. I'm pretty sure I read that, too. But I really can't find it in the rules written by themselves.
Comment on Germany Is Using AI to Erase Pro-Palestinian Speech
rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 2 days agoApparently calling for a one state solution where Israeli and palestinian leave peacefully is prohibited
hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 1 day ago
rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 1 day ago
Israel made it impossible for a two state solution to happen with all the illegal settlements. What’s wrong with dissolving Israel and create a one state solution where both can has the same rights?
hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 1 day ago
This discussion is about some peculiarities in German law concerning hate speech. And about how it might be considered hate speech if someone were to call for the termination of that country. This has nothing to do with whether one or two stated or other ideas might be better or worse.
rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 1 day ago
The law doesn’t apply on normal people or an lemmy instance managed by German admins. It target only organizations or project receiving funding from German government.
The Bundestag reaffirms its decision to ensure that no organizations or projects that spread antisemitism, question Israel’s right to exist, call for a boycott of Israel or actively support the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement receive financial support."
Obelix@feddit.org 1 day ago
You can read the post here: feddit.org/post/12529640
There is nothing there containing a one state solution and also german law totally doesn’t prohibit calling for it.
And BTW: You have a autocorrect error in your post: “leave” vs “live” can lead to people misunderstanding your point.
rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 1 day ago
The comment in that link that was removed called for a one state solution and was removes