Comment on I hope i don't get downvoted for this
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 weeks agowhy breasts are considered sexual (they aren’t)
Breasts and feet are both sensitive and responsive to touch. If you’ve ever Netflix-and-Chilled, a foot rub is a classic opening move. Meanwhile, teasing someone’s nipple is classic foreplay.
Zozano@aussie.zone 4 weeks ago
You’re not picking up what I’m laying down.
I’m not arguing that feet and breasts aren’t capable of proving sexual stimulation from a first person perspective. I’m saying at from a third person perspective, theres nothing about them which inherently arousing; that arousal stems from novelty.
lowleekun@ani.social 4 weeks ago
Just like mouth, ears and all kind of body parts are capable of providing sexual stimulation without being considered arousing in the sense we still view breasts/ass and such.
Zozano@aussie.zone 4 weeks ago
Precisely. It’s amazing how people have misinterpreted what I’ve been saying lol.
lowleekun@ani.social 4 weeks ago
People get emotional around this topic pretty fast. Don’t take the downvotes personally, i found your statements perfectly rational.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
There seems to be ample evidence to the contrary. Whole pornographic industries exist to cater to people aroused by pictures of people in various states of undress.
Zozano@aussie.zone 4 weeks ago
You’re still not getting it. The key word here is ‘inherently’.
The sexual interest in people of different states of undress, or specific attire, is just another form of novelty, and influenced by culture.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Name something that is inherently sexy.