There’s no reason to deny invalid evidence
Comment on Why 3D-Printing an Untraceable Ghost Gun Is Easier Than Ever (Podcast 18mins)
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 3 days agoFunny that they never deny the gun was his, just that the search was unconstitutional.
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 3 days ago
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 3 days ago
It does if you want people to believe the gun wasn’t yours. The gun isn’t the only evidence, and not denying it’s yours but trying to get it excluded from evidence confirms that it was yours and you’re trying to hide it.
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Good thing that’s not how evidence or the justice system works 😝
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 3 days ago
That’s how peoples opinions work, and no matter what any judge says, people can’t just forget and disregard that they know the gun was his just because a judge tells them that they are not supposed to know it was his.
My username is randomly generated, but also not ironic in this situation. Freedom has nothing to do with this.
elephantium@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Almost like the lawyer thinks “they didn’t follow procedure” is an easier legal argument than “the police dept is trying to frame my client”.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 3 days ago
The gun isn’t the only evidence. All they’re doing is drawing attention to the fact that it was his gun by not denying it was his and trying to get it excluded from evidence. Even if they win this argument and get the gun excluded, they’ve basically confirmed that the gun was his in doing so.
elephantium@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Is that a fact? Are you sure? Will you recant if it comes out that the police did, in fact, plant it?
Nitpick the lawyer’s phrasing all you like; it won’t actually change any of the facts of the case, whatever they may be. Myself, I’m not going to jump to “why bother having a trial? The police arrested him; he’s clearly guilty as sin” based on a Lemmy comment!
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 days ago
Did you just take those 2 words completely out of the context in which they were written? You sure did! I said:
I’m saying that they’re essentially confirming that the gun is his by this action. Learn to read.