Comment on 70% of games that require internet get destroyed
samus12345@lemm.ee 2 months agoThey don’t have to. They can release the code and let people run their own servers once they’re no longer interested in doing so. This costs them nothing.
Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Your last sentence is incredibly incorrect. Does exaggeration usually win you arguments where you are from?
samus12345@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Instead of just saying it’s incorrect, say why. I can just as easily say that you’re incorrect.
Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
It doesnt cost them nothing. There.
Adalast@lemmy.world 1 month ago
That is not a rebuttal. A rebuttal requires evidentiary support of your stance. For instance, as support for saying it costs them nothing, one might offer the following:
There, 3 salient points which support the position that releasing the codebase for the game when sunsetting it costs the company nothing. I could even make points about how it is actually profitable for the company, but I want to give you your turn to rebutt me now that you have a good example of how to provide a good argument.