Comment on 70% of games that require internet get destroyed

• Rekorse@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Your last sentence is incredibly incorrect. Does exaggeration usually win you arguments where you are from?

  source

  • samus12345@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Instead of just saying it’s incorrect, say why. I can just as easily say that you’re incorrect.

    source

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      It doesnt cost them nothing. There.

      source

      • Adalast@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        That is not a rebuttal. A rebuttal requires evidentiary support of your stance. For instance, as support for saying it costs them nothing, one might offer the following:

        • once released, users would distribute and maintain the file servers independently of the corporation, thus costing the company nothing.
        • once released, users would maintain independent game servers and pay for their upkeep, thus costing the company nothing.
        • once released, the modding community would take over the maintenance and development on the code base, thus costing the company nothing.

        There, 3 salient points which support the position that releasing the codebase for the game when sunsetting it costs the company nothing. I could even make points about how it is actually profitable for the company, but I want to give you your turn to rebutt me now that you have a good example of how to provide a good argument.

        source

        • -> View More Comments